e-ISSN 2355-6641       print ISSN 1978-1989

An Elderly Employment Model For The Thai Automotive Industry

Font Size:  Small  Medium  Large

An Elderly Employment Model For The Thai Automotive Industry

Pornrat Sadangharn

Abstract


This research aims at studying an elderly employment model for the Thai automotive industry. Mixed methods with a sequential exploratory strategy were utilized. Grounded theory was employed by using in-depth interviews to investigate the characteristics of elderly employment in the Thai automotive industry. For this stage of the research, theoretical and purposive sampling was used to select 32 key informants from four groups of stakeholders: (1) elderly workers, (2) employers or human resource managers, (3) government officers, and (4) academics. The findings were then validated using a quantitative approach with structural equation modelling (SEM). A total of 308 elderly workers and human resource managers were surveyed regarding their opinion about elderly employment. Based on the survey, the elderly employment model in the Thai automotive industry, which is comprised of the approach to elderly employment, elderly employment preparation, and key success factors for elderly employment, was revealed to be a good fit. 


References


Arbuckle, J. & Wothke, W. (1999). AMOS 4.0 user's guide. Chicago: Smallwaters Corportaion, Inc.

Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238-46.

Calo, T. J. (2008). Talent management in the era of the aging workforce: the critical role of knowledge transfer. Public Personnel Management, 37(4), 403–416.

Chiu,C.K., Chan, A.W.,  Snape., & Redman, T. (2001). Age stereotype and discriminatory attitude toward older workers: an east-west comparison. Human Relations, 54(5), 629–661.

Cheung, C., Kam, P.K., & Man-hung Ngn, R. (2011). Age discrimination in the labor market from the perspectives of employers and older workers. International Social Work, 54(1), 118–136.

Choo, T. E. (1999). The aging workforce: some implications, strategies and policy considerations for human resource managers. Asia Pacific of Human Resource, 37(2), 60–75.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaw, J.A. (2000), Introducing LISREL. London: Sage Publications.

Dressler, G. (2000). Human resource management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: PrenticeHall.

Elliott, R. H. (1995). Human Resource Management’s role in the future aging of  the workforce. Review of Public Personal Administration, 15(2), 6–17.

Glaser, B., (1978). Theoretical Sensitivity. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA.

Jones, D. A. & McIntosh, B.R. (2010). Organizational and occupational commitment in relation to bridge employment and retirement intentions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(2), 290–303.

Joungtrakul, J. (2010). Qualitative research: A tool for knowledge creation for national development. Bangkok: Business Law Centre International Company Limited.

Kim, S., & Feldman, D.C. (2000). Working in retirement: The antecedents of bridge employment and its consequences for quality of life in retirement. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1195–1210.

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kluge, A., & Krings, F. (2008). Attitudes toward older workers and human resource practice. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 67(1), 61–64.

Lu, L., Kao, S., & Hsieh,Y. (2011). Attitudes towards older people and managers intention to hire older workers: a Taiwanese study. Educational Gerontology, 37(10), 835–853.

McKinnon, R. (2010). An ageing workforce and strategic human resource management: staffing challenges for social security administrations. International Social Security Review, 63 (3-4), 91–113.

Ministry of Industry, Thailand (2012). Master Plan for Automotive Industry 2012 – 2016.   Ministry of Industry and Thai Automotive Institute.

Morrow-Howell, N., & Greenfield J.C. (2010). Productive engagement of older Americans. China Journal of Social Work, 3(2), 153–164.

Morrow-Howell, N. & Wang, Y. (2013). Productive engagement of older adults: elements of a cross-cultural research agenda. Ageing International, 38(2), 159–170.

National Statistical Office. (2016). Summary of ageing workforce in Thailand 2016. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: OECD. (2006). Aging and employment policies: live longer, work longer. Paris: OECD Publication.

Padula, R. S., Comper, M.L., Moraes, S. A., Sabbagh, Pagliato Junior, W., &  Perracini M. R. (2013). The work ability index and functional capacity among older workers. Brazilian Journal of Physical of Therapy, l.17(4), 382-391.

Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method, 2nd ed. London: Sage.

Pfau, B. N., &  Kay, I.T. (2002). The human capital edge: 21 people management practices your company must implement (or avoid) to maximize shareholder value. New Jersey: McGraw Hill.

Prasartkul, P., Chuanwan, S. & Thianlai, K. (2012). Elderly: inner people to be marginalized. Population and Social 2012. Bangkok: Mahidol University.

Sadangharn, P. (2016). Age discrimination and the opportunities for elderly employment: the case of the Thai automotive industry. The International Journal of Aging and Society,  6 (3), 17–27.

Soonthornchawagan, N. & Cintakulchai, S. (2009). Job opportunities creation for the elderly. Bangkok: Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute.

Soonthorndhada, K. (2011). Economic value of Thai elderly. Population and Social 2011. Bangkok: Mahidol University.

Raksathap, S.,  Kangwalpornsiri, K. & Intrarawisert, N. (2010) Final report: the project of suitable occupation and earned income opportunities in accordance with older workers. Bangkok: Research and Development Institute, Ramkhamhaeng University.

Riach, K. (2007). Othering older worker identity in recruitment. Human Relations, 60(11), 1701–1726.

Rix, S. (2005). Rethinking the role of older workers: promoting older workers employment in Europe and Japan. Accessed April 2, 2017. assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/econ/ib77_

              workers.pdf.

Roberts, I. (2006). Taking age out of the workplace: putting older workers back in?.  Work Employment and Society, 20(1), 67–86.

Stanford Centre on Longevity. (2013). Adapting to an aging workforce. Accessed April 2, 2017.  http// longevity3. stanford.edu/agingworkforce/abstract/.

Taylor, S. J. & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: the search for meanings, 2nd., Wiley, New York.

Thailand Broad of Investment. (2016). Thailand: global green automotive production base. Thailand Broad of Investment, Bangkok.

Urquhart, C. (2013). Grounded theory for qualitative Research. Los Angles, London, New Delhi: Sage.

Von Bonsdorff, M.E.,  Shultz, K.S.,  Leskinen,E., &  Tansky, J. (2009). The choice between retirement and bridge employment: a continuity theory and life course perspective. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 69(2), 79–100.

Wang MZhan YLiu S, & Shultz KS. (2008). Antecedents of bridge employment: a longitudinal investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 18–830.

World Health Organization. (1955). The employment of elderly persons. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 13(4),  595–603.


Keywords


Elderly employment; Elderly employees; Retention; Automotive industry; Mixed-methods research

DOI


10.21002/seam.v11i2.8516

Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.