Vol 16, No 2 (2012) > Articles >

Benchmark for Country-Level Earthquake Strong-Motion Instrumentation Program

Widjojo Prakoso 1 , I Nyoman Sukanta 2

Affiliations:

  1. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok 16424, Indonesia
  2. Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics of Indonesia, Jakarta 10720, Indonesia

 

Abstract:

An empirical study to develop benchmark models at country-level to assess the suggested number of earthquake strong-motion stations based on a framework encompassing geographic, demographic, and socio-economic parameters is reported. The models are to provide a working estimate of the required number of stations for improving the strong-motion instrumentation program of Indonesia. National earthquake strong-motion networks of New Zealand, Japan, Taiwan, Iran, Turkey, and Italy were used as the references. The parameter proposed is the number of stations in land area of 1,000 km2, and three models based on the exponential regression analysis are presented as functions of population density, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, and the Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) Basic Requirements Index. Using the models, it is suggested that Indonesia would require at least 750 stations. 

Keywords: benchmark, earthquake, strong-motion network, strong-motion instruments
Published at: Vol 16, No 2 (2012) pages: 129-134
DOI:

Access Counter: 1142 views, 530 PDF downloads, .

Full PDF Download

References:

Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems (COSMOS), Guidelines for Installation of Advanced National Seismic System Strong-Motion Reference Stations, Richmond, 2001, p.40.

National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Kyoshin Net (K-Net), www.k-net.bosai.go.jp, 3 July 2011.

A. Gorini, M. Nicoletti, P. Marsan, R. Bianconi, R. De Nardis, L. Filippi, S. Marcucci, F. Palma, E. Zambonelli, Bull. Earthq. Eng. 8 (2010) 1075.

M.D. Trifunac, M.I. Todorovska, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 21 (2001) 537.

M.D. Trifunac, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 29 (2009) 591.

United States Geological Survey (USGS), World Earthquake Information by Country/Region,

earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world, 3 July 2011.

Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The World Factbook, www.cia.gov/library/publications/theworld-factbook, 3 July 2011.

K. Schwab (Ed.), Global Competitiveness Report 2011-2012, World Economic Forum (WEF), Geneva, 2011, p.544.

M.E. Kahn, Rev. Econ. Stat. 87 (2005) 271.

M.K. Rad, S.G. Evans, A. Brenning, Proceedings of American Geophysical Union–Fall Meeting 2010, San Francisco, USA, 2010, abstract #NH12A-04.

GNS Science, GeoNet, www.geonet.org.nz, 22 October 2011.

T. Petersen, K. Gledhill, M. Chadwick, N.H. Gale, J. Ristau, Seismol. Res. Lett. 82 (2011) 9.

National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED), Kiban-Kyoshin Net (KiK-Net), www.kik.bosai.go.jp, 3 July 2011.

K.-L. Wen, C.-F. Wu, H.-H. Hsieh, C.-M. Lin, Proceedings of International Workshop for Site

Selection, Installation, and Operation of Geotechnical Strong-Motion Arrays, Richmond, USA, 2004, p.51.

H.M. Alavijeh, E. Farzanegan, Asian J. Civ. Eng. (Building and Housing) 4 (2003) 173.

Building and Housing Research Center (BHRC), Iran Strong Motion Network, www.bhrc.ac.ir/ismn/Index.htm, 22 June 2011.

S. Akkar, Z. Cagnan, E. Yenier, E. Erdogan, M.A. Sandikkaya, P. Gulkan, J. Seismol. 14 (2010) 457.