Vol 20, No 3 (2016) > Industrial Engineering >

Optimizing Supply Chain Collaboration Based on Agreement Buyer-Supplier Relationship with Network Design Problem

Wahyudi Sutopo 1 , Ayu Erliza 2 , Arien Heryansyah 3

Affiliations:

  1. Research Group of Logistics and Business System, Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia
  2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia
  3. Centre for Environmental Sustainability & Water Security (IPASA), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia

 

Abstract: In recent years, the rising competitive environment with shorter product life cycles and high customization forces industries to increase their flexibility, speed up their response, and enhance concurrent engineering designs. To integrate these prospects, supply chain collaboration becomes a pertinent strategy for industries to strengthen their competitiveness. The network design problem is used to implement supply chain collaboration. In the buying and selling process, sharing information between buyer and supplier are important to obtain a transaction decision. The
optimimum supply chain profit can be identified by mathematical model of network design problem. The Mathematical Model takes into consideration the uncertainity in negotiation of supply chain, transportation problems, and locationallocation of products from supplier to buyer in the planning based on the time value of money. The results show that the model can be used to optimize the supply chain profit. The supplier gets a profit because income were received in the initial contract, while the buyer profit comes from lower pay.
Keywords: collaboration, negotiation, network design problem, supply chain management, time value of money
Published at: Vol 20, No 3 (2016) pages: 114-120
DOI:

Access Counter: 442 views, 373 PDF downloads, .

Full PDF Download

References:

Chang, Proceedings of the International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, Vol. II., 2013.

H.L. Lee, V. Padmanabhan, S. Whang, Manage. Scie., 43 (1997) 558.

M.E. O’Kelly, Transportation Sci, 20 (1986) 106.

Z-J.M. Shen, C. Coullard, M.S. Daskin, Transport. Sci, 37 (2003) 55.

M.E. O’Kelly, D. Bryan, D. Skorin-Kapov, J. Skorin-Kapov, Location Science, 4 (1996) 138.

M.L.F. Cheong, R. Bhatnagar, S.C. Graves, J. Ind. Manage. Optim, 3 (2007) 69.

S. Min, A.S. Roath, P.J. Daugherty, S.E. Genchev, H. Chen, A.D. Arndt, R.G. Richey, Int. J. Logist. Manage,16 (2005) 256.

I.W. Zarman, The 50% Solution, Anchor, New York City, NY, 1976.

T.M. Simatupang, R. Sridharan, Int. J. Logist. Manage,13 (2002) 30.

G. Dudek, H. Stadtler, Int. J. Prod. Res, 45 (2007) 484.

Chopra and Meindl, Handbook of Supply Chain

Management, 2nd ed., Pearson Education, United State of America.

A. Habibie, M. Hisjam, W. Sutopo, K.H. Widodo, Proceeding of the Internasional MultiConference of

Engineers and Computer Scientists, Hong Kong, 2012.

B. Kurniawan, M. Hisjam, W. Sutopo, IEEEIEEM, 2011, p.437.

H. Rau, C.-W. Chen, W.-J. Shiang, IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Japan, 2009, p.312.

T. Hammervoll, E. Bø, Eur. J. Marketing, 44 (2010) 1139.

Anon., Annual report of PT. Indofood CBP Sukses Makmur Tbk. Surabaya, 2013, p.269.